The key is that “two days” is a measure and the measures are treated as singular. A model theme is still a topic, and your “he” could be either for a plural (“my first two days in the company were two hard first days”) or a singular (“the introductory course was a hard first day”, “this period was a hard first two days”). I doubt you have a problem with it. I`d omit the hyphen, but other than that, I`ll go with this option – “It was a hard first day” sounds quite natural spoken or written English (to those British ears) The third example also seems un natural. A simple “the first two days were hard” would suffice if one wanted to stick to a plural. “The first few days were hard” is also quite sensible and respects the S-V agreement. In informal writings, none, and both sometimes take on a plural veneer, when these pronouns are followed by a prepositional sentence that begins with. This is especially true for constructions that ask questions: “Did you read the two clowns on the order?” “Do you both take this seriously?” Burchfield calls this “a conflict between fictitious agreement and real agreement.” * This rule can lead to bumps in the road. For example, if I`m one of the two (or more) subjects, it could lead to this strange sentence: Shouldn`t Joe be followed by what, not were, since Joe is singular? But Joe isn`t really there, so let`s say we weren`t there. The sentence demonstrates the subjunctive mind used to express hypothetical, desiring, imaginary, or objectively contradictory things.
The subjunctive connects singular subjects to what we usually think of as a plural rush. If the conjunction “and” is replaced by / with / accompanied by / accompanied by / as well, the verb has no effect on the later part of these expressions. The words before these expressions are the subjects. Have you ever wondered why it is said to be very pretty and not very pretty? The answer lies in grammatical rules of concordance or subject-verb. The basic rule is that the singular obstruction must correspond to singular nouns, while the plural obstruction must correspond to plural nouns. What is a name? It is a word for people, places, events, things or ideas. Rule 8. With words that indicate parts – for example. B many, a majority, a few, all — Rule 1, which is indicated earlier in this section, is reversed, and we are led by name.
If the noun is singular, use singular verbage. If it is a plural, use a plural code. However, the word couple is a collective noun that can pose particular problems for the subject-verb concordance. It is also difficult to use the Neutrum Pronomen it or its in relation to a couple – so, if the pair is the precursor of a pronoun, we choose the pronoun she or she and use a pluralist for consistency. We will use the standard to underline topics once and verbs twice. The subject of the sentence is saliva (plural head noun), hence the plural abrasive. Note: The following sentences are also considered collective nouns and therefore singular subjects. The names of sports teams that do not end on “s” will take a plural beak: the Miami Heat have searched, the Connecticut Sun hope that new talent.
You can find help with this problem in the plural section. The answer is that it should correspond to the subject – the noun before. Although the dollar and the years are plural, we obtain a singular convergence, because in the first example we are dealing with a (singular) sum of money and a (singular) period in the second example. In the case of a singular or non-counting noun or a clause, use a singular verbing: however, if it is considered a pair, a singular verbage is used. However, the plural is used when the focus is on the individual in the group. It is much rarer. Another problem faced by users of English is: does the verb in a sentence correspond to the subject (subject) before or to the subject or adjective that underlies them (complement)? For example, she writes every day. Exception: If you use the singular “she”, use plural forms.